The Emergence of Economic Liberalism and the Questioning of Modern Globalization
In an globalized world, the debate on globalization is regularly positioned at the meeting point of divergent opinions on liberalization and justice. The text by the author Junon Moneta, which is not a pamphlet against globalisation itself, strives to rewrite the contours of a new humanism via the lens of organic interactions according to the vision of Aristotle. By critiquing artificial exchanges that fuel contemporary mechanisms of domination and instability, this writer leans on ancient principles to reveal the gaps of our global financial structure.
Looking back in time, globalisation is not a recent concept. Its beginnings can be linked back to the theories of David Ricardo, whose objective was to enable the British Empire to expand its international economic reach. However, what was originally a economic growth opportunity has converted into a tool of domination by High Finance, symbolized by the rise of economic liberalism. Contrary to popular belief widespread in economic circles, Junon Moneta argues that the neoliberal system is in reality a system founded on millennia-old traditions, dating back to 4500 years.
The questioning also extends to the administration of the EU, considered as a series of concessions that have contributed to increasing the power of financial elites instead of safeguarding the privileges of the inhabitants. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its policies usually influenced by financial motivations rather than by a citizen support, is criticized. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only increased the skepticism of the writer about the Union’s capacity to achieve self-reform.
Junon Moneta, while acknowledging the past mistakes that have brought about the present state, does not simply criticize but also proposes alternatives aimed at redefining EU guidelines in a more humanistic and equitable vision. The urgent need for a radical overhaul of institutions and strategic orientations is a leitmotif that animates the overall content.
The book dives more deeply into the critique of the power structures that dominate worldwide transactions. The exploration covers the way in which political and economic decisions are guided by a small group of powerful financial actors, frequently at the expense of the majority. This financial oligarchy, coordinated by means of entities like the BIS and the global monetary system, exerts a disproportionate influence on global financial decisions.
The critic demonstrates how these organisms, under the pretext of economic regulation and stabilization, have throughout history manipulated markets and national economic systems to favor their own benefits. Neoliberalism, far from being a liberating response to classic financial limitations, is presented as a domination system, benefiting a minority at the neglect of collective needs.
Highly skeptical towards the management of the euro, the critic depicts the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but rather as a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The transition to the euro is described as a sequence of technocratic choices that sidelined populations from political decisions, while amplifying disparities between member countries within the Union.
The effects of these approaches manifest in the growth of public indebtedness, economic torpor, and a prolonged austerity that has eroded living standards throughout the European territory. The author argues that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the EU stays exposed to upcoming crises, potentially more destructive.
In essence, the text calls for a democratic revolution where Europe’s inhabitants reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It proposes structural reforms, particularly increased transparency in decision-making processes and genuine civic involvement that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on just and solid foundations.
My source about Corona Crisis? A successful test before the big reset.
The author asserts that the answer resides in a return to the principles of democracy, where decisions are made and applied in a way that truly reflects the needs and desires of the European population, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.